Impact of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention on Care of Short-Stay Nursing Home Patients

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar;69(3):735-743. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16918. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

Abstract

Background/objectives: To assess whether an advance care planning (ACP) video intervention impacts care among short-stay nursing home (NH) patients.

Design: PRagmatic trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN) was a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial.

Setting: A total of 360 NHs (N = 119 intervention, N = 241 control) owned by two healthcare systems.

Participants: A total of 2,538 and 5,290 short-stay patients with advanced dementia or cardiopulmonary disease (advanced illness) in the intervention and control arms, respectively; 23,302 and 50,815 short-stay patients without advanced illness in the intervention and control arms, respectively.

Intervention: Five ACP videos were available on tablets or online. Designated champions at each intervention facility were instructed to offer a video to patients (or proxies) on admission. Control facilities used usual ACP practices.

Measurements: Follow-up time was at most 100 days for each patient. Outcomes included hospital transfers per 1000 person-days alive and the proportion of patients experiencing more than one hospital transfer, more than one burdensome treatment (tube-feeding, parenteral therapy, invasive mechanical intervention, and intensive care unit admission), and hospice enrollment. Champions recorded whether a video was offered in the patients' electronic medical record.

Results: There was no significant reduction in hospital transfers per 1000 person-days alive in the intervention versus control groups with advanced illness (rate (95% confidence interval (CI)), 12.3 (11.6-13.1) vs 13.2 (12.5-13.7); rate difference: -0.8; 95% CI = -1.8-0.2)). There was a nonsignificant reduction in hospital transfers per 1000 person-days alive in the intervention versus control among short-stay patients without advanced illness. Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups among patients with and without advanced illness. Based on champion only reports 14.2% and 15.3% of eligible short-stay patients with and without advanced illness were shown videos, respectively.

Conclusion: An ACP video program did not significantly reduce hospital transfers, burdensome treatment, or hospice enrollment among short-stay NH patients; however, fidelity to the intervention was low.

Keywords: Medicare; advance care planning; nursing homes; pragmatic clinical trial.

Publication types

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Advance Care Planning*
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Patient Transfer / statistics & numerical data*
  • Skilled Nursing Facilities / statistics & numerical data*
  • Video Recording